Best Free (and Freemium) AI Visibility Tools
· 7 min read · By Perciva Team
The honest answer: Otterly.ai is the only tool on this list with a genuinely free ongoing tier for AI visibility tracking, and it is where most teams should start. Knowatoa offers a free audit, HubSpot's AEO Grader is a free one-off snapshot, and Perciva offers a free one-time AI Buyer Perception Snapshot plus a 7-day trial with no credit card. Everything else marketed as "free" in this category is a time-limited trial: Trakkr and ZipTie.dev give 14 days, Gauge gives 7. Rankscale is not free but is the cheapest paid entry at around $20/mo.
That distinction matters more than it sounds. A free tier lets you build a baseline and watch it move. A free trial lets you look once. AI answers drift week to week, so a single snapshot tells you almost nothing about direction — which is why the manual method at the end of this article is sometimes a better free option than another trial.
How we picked
Perciva is our product, and it is not ranked first here because our free tier is a one-time snapshot rather than ongoing monitoring. Criteria:
- Free forever vs trial: can you keep using it at zero cost after week one?
- What the free tier actually includes: prompts, engines, refresh frequency.
- Upgrade honesty: whether the free tier is useful or purely a lead magnet.
- Setup time, since free tools compete with doing it by hand.
Where free tiers run out
Free AI visibility tools are all constrained in one of four ways, and knowing which constraint you have hit tells you what to buy next.
- Prompt caps. Free tiers typically track a handful of prompts. Real buyer coverage — comparisons against each named rival, pricing, integrations, security — needs a few dozen.
- Engine caps. Free usually means one or two engines, and rarely includes Claude. If your buyers are developers or technical evaluators, that is a meaningful blind spot.
- Refresh frequency. Free tiers refresh slowly, so you learn about a change after it has been costing you deals for weeks.
- Depth. Almost every free tier counts mentions. None of them read the answer and tell you that the reason you lost the recommendation is a claim about your pricing that has been wrong since your last repricing.
The fourth is the one that catches teams out. Mention counts can look healthy while every mention positions you as the budget fallback. If your free dashboard is green and your win rate is not, depth is the constraint, and no free tool in this category resolves it.
1. Otterly.ai — the only genuine free tier
Verdict: the default free choice, and good enough that many small teams never upgrade.
Otterly is a self-serve AI brand mention tracker with a free starter plan that carries quota caps on prompts and engines. You get scheduled tracking rather than a one-off audit, which is the thing that makes it genuinely useful — you can watch a trend rather than take a photograph.
Best for: founders and small teams establishing an AI visibility baseline. Pricing: free starter tier; paid plans from about $29/mo.
Pros:
- Ongoing free tracking, not a trial
- Minutes to set up
- Clean interface
Cons:
- Quota caps on prompts and engines
- Mention-level only — it will not tell you what was said
2. Knowatoa — best free technical audit
Verdict: free where it counts, because crawl access problems are binary and cheap to check.
Knowatoa offers a free audit to start, testing whether AI bots can reach your site. Paid Starter is $59/mo (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode); Growth at $199/mo unlocks all supported AI services plus API, MCP and Looker Studio reporting.
Pros: the free audit answers a real question; genuinely technical output. Cons: ongoing monitoring is paid; entry tier is three surfaces.
3. HubSpot AEO Grader — best free one-off snapshot
Verdict: a free readiness check from a company with no reason to upsell you a monitoring tool.
After HubSpot acquired xFunnel in 2025, much of that capability resurfaced in HubSpot's free AEO Grader. It is a snapshot audit of your answer-engine readiness — not continuous monitoring, no competitor tracking, no change history — but it costs nothing and takes minutes.
Pros: free; fast; no commitment. Cons: one-off snapshot; no ongoing tracking. See xFunnel alternatives for what replaced the standalone product.
4. Perciva — free snapshot plus a no-card trial
Verdict: the deepest free look at buyer-intent answers, but a snapshot rather than a free tier.
Perciva offers a one-time free AI Buyer Perception Snapshot for any company, plus a 7-day free trial with no credit card required. The snapshot shows how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude answer buyer-intent questions about you, including the verbatim answers and which claims they make. After that it is paid: Starter €49/mo, Growth €129/mo, Team €299/mo.
Pros: claim-level output at no cost; no credit card for the trial. Cons: no free forever tier; B2B SaaS focus.
5. Rankscale — cheapest paid alternative to free
Verdict: when free is not enough, this is the smallest cheque in the category.
Credit-based pricing from around $20/mo covering 17+ engines and 240+ regions. For roughly the cost of two coffees you get broader engine coverage than most free tiers allow.
Pros: very low entry; widest engine list. Cons: not free; credit budgeting is manual.
6. Trakkr — best 14-day trial with everything unlocked
Verdict: the most generous trial, because all tracked models are included rather than gated.
Trakkr's 14-day free trial includes all eight tracked AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI). Paid plans start around £79/mo (roughly $100) for one brand and 50 prompts.
Pros: nothing gated during the trial; white-label reports on paid plans. Cons: trial only; entry tier caps at one brand.
7. ZipTie.dev — best trial for SEO teams
Verdict: 14 days is enough to get real optimization briefs out of it.
Real-browser monitoring of Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT and Perplexity with a 14-day free trial; Starter is $69/mo afterwards. Pros: actionable briefs during the trial. Cons: trial only; three engines.
Comparison table
| Tool | Free offering | Ongoing? | Paid entry |
| Otterly.ai | Free starter tier | Yes | ~$29/mo |
| Knowatoa | Free audit | No | $59/mo |
| HubSpot AEO Grader | Free grader | No | Not applicable |
| Perciva | Free snapshot plus 7-day trial | No | €49/mo |
| Rankscale | None | No | ~$20/mo |
| Trakkr | 14-day trial, all models | No | ~£79/mo |
| ZipTie.dev | 14-day trial | No | $69/mo |
| Gauge | 7-day trial | No | $99/mo |
The free method that needs no tool
If you have no budget at all, this takes about an hour a month and beats a stale dashboard.
- Write down ten buyer questions: "best [category] tool," "[you] vs [top rival]," "how much does [you] cost," "does [you] integrate with [key system]," and so on.
- Run each one in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, logged out or in a fresh session to reduce personalization.
- Paste every answer into a dated document. This is the part people skip and the part that matters — without stored answers you cannot detect change.
- Mark three things per answer: were you named, were you recommended, and was anything factually wrong.
- Repeat monthly and diff against the previous run.
The limits are obvious: it is slow, it samples once rather than repeatedly, and personalization means your results and your buyer's may differ. But it produces the one thing free dashboards usually do not — the actual answer text, which is what you need to write a fix.
How to choose
Start with the free tier that keeps running, add a free technical audit to rule out crawl problems, and only pay once you know which questions are broken. If you find that AI is naming you but describing you wrongly, no free tool in this list will fix it — that is where paid claim-level monitoring starts to pay for itself.
Related: are there free AI visibility tools, best AI visibility tools for startups, and the AI visibility audit checklist.